Iron boss often fall into the negative news, the public will think of the word "monopoly". In fact, many times, I think it is more important to study some specific issues. $ 40 lunch how to sell huge railway system, but also a drop in the bucket, the image points deduction, it is not worth the candle, I believe, also the railway authorities do not want to see the reality of this petty.

Where is the problem? Dining car on the high-speed rail service is mainly divided into two types, one outsourced to the enterprise, one is to operate independently, the dining car staff wages is basic salary plus a commission of the sales stuff, if it is to sell more, the total price is expensive their income is relatively high. Visible, high-priced lunch but caused due to the irrational system management mode. Is the so-called section to determine success or failure.

For the development of China's railway industry, the official and the private sector often come to completely opposite evaluation. The official always stressed to 6% of the world's business mileage, we completed 25% of the world's carrying capacity, especially in recent years to the siren song of the railway infrastructure and technology development, which is no denying the fact that.

However, in public opinion, more developed railway seems to be more backward, more problems. In fact, this is the familiar "bucket theory" to determine the volume of a barrel is a piece of the shortest plank. The shortest board that manages the railway sector, in terms of philosophy and sense of service. The development of the railway speed of light is not enough, even faster with the quality of software and hardware go hand in hand.

If the railway sector decision-makers so engrossed in this type of speed, high-tech impossibly bright appearance, while ignoring the management and services of the kernel, then collapse ticketing platform, high-priced lunch like trouble, it will from time to time pull high-speed rail, the hind legs of the EMU are, so that the development of China's railway looks always seemed so get awkward.
The say Spring Festival travel by train to buy tickets is difficult, more difficult to eat on the train. As early as the end of 2011, the Ministry of Railways announced to the public supply of EMU trains service quality standards (provisional), which explicitly requires: to ensure that the passenger train 2 yuan mineral water, less than $ 15 lunch for and shall not be broken.

But the actual reporter investigating the situation, lunch in the dining car of the high-speed rail is simply to buy less than 10 yuan or 15 yuan, 40 yuan for lunch eat only eat. In this regard, the dining car on the staff explained that "has long been sold out.

Little a lunch meal so much as profits, and robbery What's the difference? High-speed rail is something that can not provide the high-priced lunch, to meet the different needs of consumers, but since it is a service, it should be fair and reasonable principle of consumer-based, and not for business purposes, not to reap huge profits for the final demands .

Profit of up to 400 percent high-priced lunch, and only this one no other choice, not only away from the railway public service qualities, in fact, constitute infringement Shaw consumers interests. Only provide the higher-priced lunch, refused to sell instant noodles "the fact that enough to prove that consumers' Where is God, simple is the lamb to the slaughter.

As early as the end of 2011, the Ministry of Railways announced to the public supply of EMU trains service quality standards (provisional), which explicitly requires: to ensure that the passenger train 2 yuan mineral water, less than $ 15 lunch for and shall not be broken. This provision before the start of the spring of this year, once again reiterated the railway sector.

From a realistic point of view, "reiterated the" great irony. The reasons are but two ways, First, this was originally a ornamental value the "vase provisions" without substance, its only significance is perfunctory and cope with public opinion the Zhengdian image points, from policy formulation to perform between the lack of effective system constraints. Either way, the need for improvement and to enhance awareness of the level of management of the railway sector.
The the Rose Luqiu consecutive days two blog to write "what is news", the goals against Chaijing, means more like a show host, not a reporter, do programs can only be regarded as television performances can not be regarded as news. In her view, the reporter should hide yourself behind the parties and news events, news should not only care about the event, but should be more concerned about the reasons behind the incident.

The Lvqiu motives behind Chai Jing been well aside here, but Lvqiu Bowen indeed leads to the "news" discussion is worth to say a few words.

In general, the reporter interviewed a news event, and really should not be too prominent journalists, nor should be brought into the reporter's point of view and emotions. But this is the practice of incident reporting and investigative journalism. In my opinion, these two articles of Lvqiu News narrowing into investigative journalism.

An iconic news events, just by showing the cause of the incident after the results of investigating the reasons for its occurrence, social background, all of this news is not enough all-round demonstration. Press operation on a variety of forms, forms for the content service. An event occurs in the people and not other people experienced with the growth of the news events of the parties, and value judgments, have a relationship was education, his upbringing, value judgments, showing this day and age, this stratum of society, a partial face, who said that the personal circumstances of the parties and the news did not close it?

Interview parties show motive, reason and reflection, show a thing had occurred deep-rooted background, is not in the form of Lvqiu the good news. An iconic event must be demonstrated through different forms of three-dimensional rendering, a difference which can there be better or worse?

The definition of the news recently based on actual events, the reporter is not defined explanation must be standing outside the screen. Like "The New Yorker" Hessler those things written, like Southern Chronicle won the Pulitzer Prize, is simply the reporter's personal experience, they strung changes at all levels of the society through personal experience survival status, thinking, showing the face of a society in transition, who can say, this is not news? As long as the reflected facts, not fabricated, how the present form has no boundaries. As much as the media, should mining different means to show the news, rather than self-handicapping.
Taiwan's government in the three groups on the policy of the Diaoyu Islands basic policies and principles, that is, the "Donghai peace initiative", "do not conflict, not to evade, and jointly deal with the other side.

Ma Ying-jeou first look at one of the principles of the Diaoyu Islands issue "does not conflict does not evade." I think, not conflict "is said to listen to the United States and Japan, aims to maintain Taiwan and the friendly relations between Japan and the United States;" evade "is said to listen to both parties, including the United States and Japan, the island of Taiwan and the mainland, and its intentions in order to maintain the visibility of Taiwan in the dispute over sovereignty of the Diaoyutai.

Negotiations with Japan Taiwan spindle is on fishing rights and fishing protection, and look forward to fishing rights negotiations between the future and the day after a certain progress, they will gradually move to the spindle of "co-development".

August 5 last year, Ma Ying-jeou proposed Donghai peace initiative "in favor of the parties to exercise self-restraint, and called for putting aside disputes and jointly develop.

The face of Beijing's demand pressure teamed up with Japan to jointly defend the Diaoyu Islands, followed by inspections Peng Jia Lantau, Ma Ying-jeou asked the East China Sea Peace Initiative "to promote the Programme, called for" 2 side dialogue "(Taipei - Tokyo, Beijing - Tokyo, Taipei - Beijing) with a group of 3 sides of consultation "(Taipei - Tokyo - Beijing). In fact the only feasible Taipei and Beijing, "cross-strait dialogue. Cross-strait dialogue with jointly deal with the other side there is a certain contradiction between the significant facts, how to clarify the definition and scope, I am afraid that Taipei has not yet begun specific job.

I think that, from the experience of the South China Sea, "cooperation", "cross-strait dialogue," the first stage should be set in the areas of research cooperation. Since two years ago, the author repeatedly called on the two sides established the East China Sea / Diaoyu research institutions and held annually in Taiwan and overseas Chinese scholars, including the Symposium, at the same time seeking the future development of cross-strait common talking points on the issue of sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands so will it be possible to achieve some degree of "consistent foreign situation.

Cross-strait cooperation, "Diaoyu Islands" road ahead will be long.